A catalogue title can feel like a complete answer. If an object is called a cosmetic spoon, surely its use is settled? Read the accompanying discussion and the picture may become more interesting.
Keep the qualification
The Met’s ivory spoon, object 1994.70, is dated approximately 1300–1080 BCE. Its discussion connects decorated spoons with imagery of renewal while noting that their actual use remains poorly understood.
Those statements can stand together. A descriptive category, a material identification and an interpretation of imagery do not necessarily settle the precise actions performed with the object.
Ask two different questions
In a reading notebook, create one column for form and decoration, another for proposed use. Put the source of each statement beside it. If the museum qualifies an interpretation, retain that qualification in your summary.
For example, “the catalogue discusses symbolic associations” is different from “the owner used it in this exact ceremony”. The second sentence requires evidence that the first does not supply.
Let uncertainty improve the visit
Rather than treating the unanswered question as a defect, use it to look more closely at the linked museum images. Which details are clearly described, and which invite further research?
Our decorative illustration does not reproduce the ivory object. Compare this reading with the limits of identifying an amulet by shape, where a familiar outline also leaves important questions open.